My townie sent me this:
In his dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lawrence
v. Texas, the Texas sodomy decision, Justice Scalia stated, “Today’s opinion
is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture,
that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda . . . .” In
case you were not aware of the nature of “the so-called homosexual agenda,”
much less its existence, I offer the following, which is reprinted from John
Carroll’s column of this past Monday in the SF Chronicle (but which
pre-dates his column, as I recall seeing it a while ago):
6 a.m. Gym.
“8 a.m. Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites).
“9 a.m. Hair appointment.
“10 a.m. Shopping (preferably at Neiman Marcus or Nordstrom).
“11 a.m. Brunch.
“2 p.m. Assume complete control of the federal, state and local governments.
Destroy Christian marriage. Replace all school counselors in grades K-12
with militant recruiters for the homosexual lifestyle. Bulldoze all houses
of worship or redecorate them as discos. Secure total control of the
Internet and all mass media. Be utterly fabulous!
“2:30 p.m. Get 40 winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from the
stress of world conquest; aromatherapy.
“4 p.m. Cocktails.
“6 p.m. Light dinner (soup, salad [arugula with balsamic vinegar dressing],
“8 p.m. Theater.
“10:30 p.m. Cocktails in a charming neighborhood bistro.
“Midnight. Bed (du jour).”
if you want 🙂
hell yes. can i be a homosexual too?
Maybe this is just me being too much of an Obie, but this might offend some people. Just a thought.
I think it’s a great dig at homophobes.
That too (a great dig at homophobes). I just couldn’t quite tell who was making fun of whom.